Asterault wrote: I have no comment.

Asterault,

Those are my good traits. Who am I to have an opinion? Maybe a thinking, rational individual.

How many pages of leftist propaganda do you deem necessary for me to read before I am informed of world events? You see, that's the problem. Name me a source out there that isn't tainted by leftist propaganda.

Salamanca,

Yeah, the war in Iraq has nothing to do with 9/11. I've heard this leftist misinformation a few times. But I've never heard it from a reliable source.

Well then my Gazpacho friend, you should really cocnsider what your "reliable" sources are. oh wait....where DID those weapons of mass destruction go, seems as if they COULDNT find any.......
Truth is truth, no other way around it. Like someone said earlier, Your way of thinking is TERRIBLY dangerous.....
If you would like a list of sources, i would be happy to give provide them to you. What or who may i ask are YOUR sources, CNN, NBC??? Remember who owns those stations....

Gazpacho, one more thing? Do you really believe Iraq had something to do with 9/11????? Where was it again that those horrible hjackers were from, just a country over........

Nothing upsets me more....

Here's an analysis of the photos I found surfing the web. Don't look Gazpacho!

http://www.counterpunch.org/block05142004.html

"I want to take a long, hard look at Bush's sexuality. Because The Photos are Bush's porn. Oh, he says they "disgust" him. Of course, they do. Listen, I'm a sex therapist. Many of my clients will say something disgusts them at first, only to confess a few sessions later that it really turns them on."

Even a partison could recognize that goofy nonesense barry

Fup

Salamanca02 - They haven't found the WMD, but sorry, that doesn't indicate evil. Everyone thought that they had them. And if Bush was evil enough to lie about them being there - he would have been evil enough to make SURE that they found them....

Fup

Everyone was made to think they had them. anyways, thats really besides the point. I think it should be 100 percent fact before you go in and rip apart a country that doesnt want us there in the first place. And if that the 100 percent proof is not there, then do not stage a war in its name...

Barry,

Note exactly a reliable source, but my guess is you knew that. There are some real funny articles in there. Whenever I want a laugh, its one of my favorite places to go for conspiracy and paranoia freaks.

Wolf

salamanca02,

How soon we forget! The war was not waged exclusively in WMD's name, violation of the first war's agreements were more than enough. The country was already in pieces, allot worse than we expected (another intelligence breakdown).

All you have to do is look at the 9/11 commission circus to see if you should wait for "proof" before acting against violent maniac's (like Hussein). The US was no longer going to take any chances. World sympathy was not going to stop terrorism, and inspite of all the hysteria, Bush has provided the best chance for democratic freedom in the Arab Middle East. Those that are trying to stop it there would like to maintain the US as an enemy - and don't want the hand-over of power to a democratic Iraqi. If they just wanted us out, all they'd have to do is wait, and not that long (they know that). Like here, a sussessful tranfer of power would be bad for their own political power hopes.

Inspite of the prison fiasco, the people on the ground there have done a great job and are working hard to re-build much of the country. The greatest mistake was probably the total disbanding of the original Army, and most of the police. They weren't all engaged in the worst form of brutality, and bringing them back under careful screening will help allot.

I wish the UN was more affective, but thy're not. The same forces that are snipping at US forces would do the same to them - except that they'd bug-out immediately. They have a terrible record in tough circumstances....

Okay, I'm done.

Fup