I wouldn't select Bogotá. Although it is not
in the contested area semi-controlled by the guerilla, it's pretty close (100, 200 miles?) to one of the ends of it, and there is also the scarce possibility of bein affected by a bombing or riot.
So, going to a non-touristy (better watched) area in Colombia, specially those which range from the south-west to Bogotá is pretty risky. Probably nothing will happen, but if it does, it could be a kidnap or a shot. Even majors are killed these days, and not only in hamlets or within the guerrilla area.
Besides of this, you'll have to be very careful on where you go and who with, like in most of the Latinoamerican Countries nowadays, including Argentina, just to avoid muggings and steals. In Colombia it's worse, according to a friend of mine who has been there several times, because of the lack of control that the civil war brings, but Mexico and Ecuador shouldn't be too far in this lastly mentioned dangers.
It's
not like in Costa Rica. If you go to some other Latinoamerican country you'll have to begin thinking on
wether the city is safe or not itself, like the Caribbean coast in Colombia, the richer areas in Mexico and Ecuador, ..., and keep in mind that the capital in those countries is much more dangerous than samller cities/towns, except for the mentioned about Colombia.
Going to Colombia, seems too close to being crazy for considering it. Going to one of the others, not. But you know what you'll have to watch and what you are exposed to.
One of the things my latino female friends tell me they like about Spain is the general safety feeling. They, themselves, go out in groups, always with men, and (like some told me about Venezuela) people is robbed even in the cities, in the middle of the street, in the daylight. They always have a gun at least in each home, ...