A few calculations and observations after reading the aforementioned article (sensationalized - in my opinion):
Title: Spanish drinking binge ends in riots, 80 injured
First Paragraph:
Tens of thousands of young people gathered in cities around Spain on Friday night in an attempt to hold the biggest street drinking session or "botellon" ("big bottle"). In the southern city of Granada, police said 25,000 people joined the botellon.
SIXT Paragraph:
Police blamed the disturbances on about 200 people who, police said, were out to cause trouble.
Okay. "Tens of Thousands" of people attended so we don't have a near-exact number. But they say that 25,000 were in Granada so we'll PRETEND it only took place in Granada for the moment.
If 80 of 25,000 people were injured DUE TO these riots, that would mean that 0.3% percent of the total partiers were injured. Of course, this 0.3% number would be less if an ALL SPAIN PARTIERS number was used to calculate this.
If 200 troublemakers were blamed for these riots, that would mean that 0.8% of the total were out to cause trouble. Again, this number would be less if an ALL SPAIN PARTIERS number was used to calculate this.
The title of the aformentioned article sure raises some eyebrows around the world, people reading through the paper would think to themselves, "My God! What's happening to the people in Spain?! Drunken riots are breaking out everywhere! It's absolute chaos!!"
Question 1:
How many people typically attend (inside and out of the statdium) a Real Madrid versus Atlético de Madrid soccer/football match? 70,000+?
Question 2:
What percentage of those people are injured during aforementioned soccer/football match?
Question 3:
What percentage of those people are arrested before, during, and after any-given game?
While I'm not at all unhappy about group assembly, I DO think it only fair that they should be required to submit an application to the local municipality for such assembly just as any march or demonstration would be required to do.
Also, there's the MESS! SMALL botellónes generate a massive, disgusting amount of WASTE (and I mean both the manufactured AND the HUMAN
organic kind) left all over the street and in the corners and in the fountains and wherever.
When the city of Madrid sponsors the annual New Years Eve festivities every year at the Puerta del Sol they (the city) provide security, clean-up, and certain other facilities for those attending. But weekend botellónes are not city-sponsored events - although the recent BIG ONE in Granada seemed to be city-sponsored, the city
providing them with a LARGE field to have their gathering, toilets, trash containers, and security.
Quote from aforementioned article:
Some cities, such as Seville, Granada and Valladolid, allowed the gatherings to take place in designated areas and up to 25,000 people gathered in the southern city of Granada.
Remember that article titles are creatively
enhanced to gather the most attention while adding quite a bit of PERSONAL opinion of the writer. Whatever happened to just reporting the news, the facts, and letting the reading make his own opinion? I mean to say, who says that 200 hundred trouble makers makes a riot situation? Who says that all of those 25,000 youths are there ONLY to get drunk? - didn't many go just to "hang out" and be with their friends while, possibly, having a few drinks and NOT getting drunk? On the surface, sure, it looks like a HUGE, DRUNKEN binge where vomit, urine, and violence is the COMMON theme here. BUT IT'S NOT! The common theme is, in MY opinion, another example in democratic societies of youthful rebellion against society's rules and controls upon them. Who among us never did anything to rebell against the rules when we were young? It's just that things today are more organized with mobile phone text messaging and the internet where "tens of thousands of people" can be mobilized towards a common goal.
The headlines of that article would have been even MORE attention grabbing had there been more riots had the police tried to STOP these botellónes across Spain. Imagine the photos and videos taken of RoboCop-dressed riot officers whacking away at rioters with their sticks, bleeding, dragging rioters across the street, making the Rodney King beating scene look like a Valentines Day party. Which is the worst of the two "evils"?? I say "Let them drink and get it over with! They're not hurting anyone but themselves and we all must pass through this stage in youth."
Now, if this was something they planned EVERY weekend, well, that would be different but it seems, SO FAR, that this was a one-time (or infrequent) event.
This all reminds me of the VERY recent
youthful protests (and "RIOTS") in Paris where the right-wing government's new law which:
The law would allow businesses to fire young workers in the first two years on a job without giving a reason, removing them from protections that restrict layoffs of regular employees.
Someone reads THIS headline and think, "Those crazy French people. They're never satisfied!" RIGHT! It's when you get "satisfied" that your relaxed, passive state allows OTHERS to IMPOSE their restrictions upon you. Are THESE French youths RADICALS and FANATICS too just like the Spanish youths? Aren't they both fighting for their rights in different ways? And then "fighting for your rights" is written in the press as a BAAAAD thing.
WHO'S trying to control YOU and HOW and WHY? Are you even aware of it? Do you care enough about your rights to spend a moment thinking about them?
Saludos, MadridMan